Since the last election, eight electorates have been represented by “Teal” independents, supported (including with donations) by the Climate 200 group, which the Australian Electoral Commissions defines as a “significant third party”.
The Teals’ record shows they:
Parliament’s official Hansard shows that since the last election, eight Teal independents in the House of Representatives have:
Source: Parliamentary Hansard, May 2022 to February 2025
Despite claiming to want “transparency”, the Teal Independents have consistently refused to state who they would support in the event of a hung parliament.
Their biggest fundraiser, Simon Holmes à Court, has pointed to the Gillard/Rudd minority government between 2010 and 2013 as what they want to achieve.1 In that hung parliament, independents put Labor into minority government, leading to the world’s biggest Carbon Tax and three years of chaos.
Prior to the election, the Teals had no detailed economic policies.
Since the election, it has been a very mixed bag. For example:
In February 2023, every Teal Independent voted with the Greens against legislation (supported by both Labor and the Coalition) which makes more people with criminal convictions unable to get Australian Visas.5
In November 2023, following the mass release of hardened criminals from immigration detention, four Teal Independents (Daniel, Haines, Tink and Ryan) voted against urgent legislation to introduce electronic monitoring and criminalise breaches of visa conditions.6
In November 2023 seven Teal Independents (Daniel, Ryan, Haines, Tink, Scamps, Steggall and Chaney) voted with the Greens against legislation enabling the minister to request a court to cease a dual citizen’s Australian citizenship, where they have been convicted of serious offences including terrorism, espionage and offences relating to explosives and lethal devices.7
In February 2025, six Teal Independents (Daniel, Ryan, Haines, Tink, Steggall and Chaney) voted with the Greens against bipartisan amendments to introduce minimum mandatory sentences for terrorism offences and the display of prohibited terrorist symbols and nazi symbols.8
In October 2023, nine days following the 7 October attacks by Hamas on Israel, two Teal MPs earned the ire of prominent Jewish leaders, as reported in the Australian:
Two Sydney teal MPs have joined forces with the Greens to accuse Israel of war crimes just nine days after Hamas terrorists murdered more than 1400 Israelis, in a move condemned as “reprehensible” by prominent Jewish leaders.
Sydney MPs Kylea Tink and Sophie Scamps, and Tasmania’s Andrew Wilkie, backed an attempt by Greens leader Adam Bandt to amend the bipartisan motion, seeking to erase a statement declaring Australia “stands with Israel and recognises its inherent right to defend itself”…
The NSW Jewish Board of Deputies condemned the MPs’ position as “completely indefensible and morally reprehensible”, while the Executive Council of Australian Jewry accused them of a “moral fog” that insulted the Jewish people.9
Despite claiming they are independent and driven by community movements, it is telling that in federal elections, Teals have only seriously run against Liberal and Nationals MPs.
They use a campaign operation – Populares – with deep links to the Labor Party and GetUp.10
Despite campaigning heavily on climate change and ending fossil fuels:
Despite campaigning heavily on integrity:
Despite campaigning on transparency, the Teals consistently refuse to say who they would put into government if there is a hung parliament after the election.
Far from being a grassroots, organic movement, the Teal movement is backed by wealthy donors, led by Simon Holmes à Court.
Of the $12.8 million in donations declared by Mr Holmes à Court’s “Climate 200” group (up to 2022-23), 97% of the donations have come from just NSW and Victoria.15